A Study Has Been Released Predicting a Rocky Future for the Common Core Standards
By Cameron Pipkin
Lot’s in the news today about the Common Core State Standards—most of it negative.
First, much of the national discussion over the Standards is coming out of states that are attempting to abolish them. The most recent of these, South Carolina, is having a serious standoff, with Common Core detractors appearing everywhere, from the governor to the state schools superintendent.
Second, a report conducted by the Brookings Institution was released this week regarding (among other things) the viability of the Common Core Standards. Rather than summarize, I’ll just quote what the study said.
States have had curricular standards for schools within their own borders
for many years. Data on the effects of those standards are analyzed
to produce three findings. 1) The quality of state standards, as indicated
by the well-known ratings from the Fordham Foundation, is not related
to state achievement. 2) The rigor of state standards, as measured by how
high states place the cut point for students to be deemed proficient, is also
unrelated to achievement. Raising or lowering the cut point is related to
achievement in fourth grade, but the effect is small, and the direction of
causality (whether a change in cut point produces a change in test score
or vice versa) is difficult to determine. 3) The ability of standards to
reduce variation in achievement, in other words to reduce differences in
achievement, is also weak.
So, essentially, the Brookings Institute finds, based upon the past success of individual states’ standards, that standards, and subsequently the Common Core, don’t affect student achievement in any way, and that they don’t level the educational playing field.
I have my own opinions on these findings, but all I’ll say for now is this: in the last week I’ve read studies and expert analyses that have rejected the role of curricular standards, assessments, funding, and teacher education in elevating student success. What does that leave us with? It seems that the only elevating factor anyone can agree on is family income and parental involvement. In the wake of the Common Core Standards, is this really the only solution we can count on in education? It would be a shame if it were, because it isn’t a solution at all, but a cause.
What do you think of the Brookings Institute’s findings? Are there flaws in their methods, or the way they drew their conclusions? How are we going to fix our schools?